Putin foe Navalny avoids detention during new Russian trial

Source: Reuters - Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:40 GMT
Author: Reuters
Opposition leader Alexei Navalny talks to the media after leaving a justice court building in Moscow, April 22, 2014 REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

MOSCOW, April 24 (Reuters) - A Russian court rejected a request by prosecutors to put Kremlin foe Alexei Navalny behind bars during a second trial on theft charges, leaving one of President Vladimir Putin's most prominent critics under house arrest.

Navalny, who is serving a five-year suspended sentence on a theft conviction he says was Putin's revenge for his opposition, could be jailed for years if found guilty of stealing more than 30 million roubles ($840,200) from two companies through fraud.

But the judge's decision to prolong his house arrest instead of moving him to a detention facility, as prosecutors and prison authorities had requested, suggests the Kremlin is concerned that jailing him could cause protests.

After gaining prominence with an on-line crusade against the corruption that he says permeates Putin's government, Navalny emerged from a wave of street protests in 2011-2012 as Russia's most popular opposition leader.

The initial theft conviction prevents Navalny, 37, from running for office for years. He startled the Kremlin with a strong second-place showing in a Moscow mayoral election last year.

Putin weathered the protests to win a third presidential term in 2012 and critics say the legal pressure on Navalny is part of a intensified clampdown on dissent since his return to the Kremlin. Putin denies he interferes in court cases.

($1 = 35.7037 Russian Roubles)

(Writing by Steve Gutterman; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus