×

Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Human imprint has thrust Earth into new geological epoch - study

by Reuters
Thursday, 7 January 2016 19:00 GMT

A labourer stacks concrete blocks on his head at the construction site of a residential complex on the outskirts of Kolkata, India, Nov. 2, 2015. REUTERS/Rupak De Chowdhuri

Image Caption and Rights Information

Atomic age and post-war leap in mining, industry, farming and use of manmade materials have left geological traces

* "Anthropocene" may have begun in mid-20th century

* Evidence of human influence on planet overwhelming

By Alister Doyle

OSLO, Jan 7 (Reuters) - The indelible imprint left by human beings on Earth has become so clear that it justifies naming a new geological epoch after mankind, experts said on Thursday.

The dawn of the "Anthropocene" would signal the end of the Holocene epoch, considered to have begun 11,700 years ago at the end of the Ice Age. The new term, suggested in 2000, is based on the Greek word "anthropos", meaning "man".

"Human activity is leaving a pervasive and persistent signature on Earth," said a report in the journal Science by an international team led by Colin Waters of the British Geological Survey.

"We are becoming a geological agent in ourselves," Waters told Reuters.

The start date could be around the mid-20th century, the authors wrote.

They said the atomic age, starting with a bomb test in New Mexico in the United States on July 16, 1945, and the post-war leap in mining, industry, farming and use of manmade materials such as concrete or plastics all left geological traces.

Concrete, invented by the Romans, was now so ubiquitous that it would amount to one kg (2.2 lbs) for every square metre (11 sq feet) of the planet's surface if spread out evenly, they said.

Any formal recommendation to adopt the Anthropocene as a new geological epoch would require years of extra research, partly to pin down a start date, Waters said.

Some experts reckon the Anthropocene began with Europe's Industrial Revolution in the 18th century. Others would give it a more widespread origin, dating it from the spread of agriculture several thousand years ago.

"Any definition will inform the stories that we tell about human development," said Professor Simon Lewis of University College London, who was not involved in the study. He favours 1610 as a start date, marking the spread of colonialism, disease and trade to the Americas from Europe.

Erle Ellis of the University of Maryland, a co-author of the study released on Thursday, said pinning down the Anthropocene would transform understanding of humanity's role on the planet.

He said it was a "challenge no smaller than a second Copernican revolution". In the 16th century, Nicolaus Copernicus helped show the Earth rotates around the sun. (Abstract available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aad2622; Reporting by Alister Doyle; editing by Andrew Roche)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

-->