Key Ugandan HIV control body under pressure to close, activists object

by Evelyn Lirri | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Wednesday, 10 February 2016 15:06 GMT

In this file 2014 photo, a doctor draws blood from a man to check for HIV/AIDS at a mobile testing unit in Ndeeba, a suburb in Uganda's capital Kampala. REUTERS/Edward Echwalu

Image Caption and Rights Information
New HIV infections have increased in Uganda in recent years, a change attributed mainly to complacency among the public

By Evelyn Lirri

KAMPALA, Feb 10 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Two parliamentary committees want to cut costs by closing down the Uganda Aids Commission (UAC), set up 24 years ago to oversee and coordinate HIV prevention and control - despite activists' fears that this could damage the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Uganda was seen as a role model in tackling the HIV epidemic in the 1990s, and activists say the effectiveness of the UAC led several other countries to take it as a model for their their AIDS response and management.

Parliament's budget and health committees have recommended dissolving the UAC in order to cut costs and end the duplication of roles between the commission, a semi-autonomous agency under the Office of the President, and the Aids Control Programme, which is under the Ministry of Health.

The UAC was set up at a time when the HIV/AIDS epidemic was ravaging the country, and was responsible for formulating policy, coordinating HIV programmes across several ministries, mobilizing and monitoring resources, leading advocacy activities and promoting HIV/AIDS-related research.

It does not directly implement HIV/AIDS programmes.

Parliament's health committee recommended amending the law which established the commission to make it answerable to the Ministry of Health.

"By maintaining UAC under the President's Office and AIDS Control programme under the Health Ministry, it makes government duplicate activities," the committee wrote in their report.

The UAC chairman, Prof. Vinand Nantulya, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation he disagreed with the committees, and said the UAC board had written to the president, Speaker of Parliament and health ministry, objecting to the proposal.

"We have already expressed our concerns. When this recommendation was made, we were not consulted," said Nantulya. "This is not a standard way of formulating policy," he added.

Parliament is currently in recess ahead of general elections on Feb. 18 and no action is expected until the election results are known. Parliament's current term ends in May.

Civil society groups issued a joint statement on Monday to express concern over the recommendation, describing it as an "unfortunate development" which would reverse the way HIV is managed in Uganda.

"This is a decision that is going to have high consequences for the national HIV response," said Joshua Wamboga, executive director of the Uganda Network of AIDS Service Organisations.

Dr Lydia Mungherera, an activist who lives with HIV, said dissolving the UAC now would be a "major strategic mistake that will lead to a reversal in the gains Uganda has started to make, negatively impacting the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS."

New HIV infections have increased in Uganda in recent years, a change attributed mainly to complacency among the public and the advent of life-prolonging drugs, and prevalence currently stands at 7.3 percent of the population.

UAC figures show that 1.5 million Ugandans are living with HIV, some 143,000 of them children, out of a population estimated at 39 million.

More that 99,000 Ugandans became newly infected with HIV in 2014, a drop from 137,000 in 2013, the figures show.

At least 823,000 Ugandans, 61,000 of them children, are enrolled in antiretroviral treatment, 56 percent of all those living with HIV.

(Editing by Tim Pearce; Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, which covers humanitarian news, women's rights, corruption, climate change. Visit

Latest News
Comments Close
Key Ugandan HIV control body under pressure to close, activists object

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus