* Justices say Congress did not allow such suits
* Ruling protects Ashcroft, Mueller, others from lawsuit
* Plaintiffs' lawyer says ruling sends dangerous message (Adds comments from detainee lawyers)
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON, June 19 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to former President George W. Bush's attorney general, FBI chief and other officials, ruling they cannot be sued over the treatment of detainees, mainly Muslims, rounded up in New York after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The justices, in a 4-2 decision, reversed a lower court's decision that said the long-running suit brought by the detainees could proceed against former Attorney General John Ashcroft, former FBI Director Robert Mueller and others. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating possible collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump's campaign team in the 2016 U.S. presidential race.
Three of the justices did not participate in the ruling.
"The court's decision allows for high-level officials to violate the Constitution without fear of personal accountability - a dangerous message in this time of rampant state-sponsored discrimination against Muslim and immigrant communities," said Rachel Meeropol, a lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights advocacy group who represents the detainees.
The civil rights lawsuit sought to hold the various former officials responsible for racial and religious profiling and abuse in detention that the plaintiffs said they endured after being swept up following the 2001 attacks carried out by al Qaeda Islamic militants on the United States.
Writing for the court, conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy said the allegations were serious and that the Supreme Court did not condone such treatment of detainees. But, Kennedy said, the only issue for the court was whether Congress had authorized such lawsuits against public officials. It had not, the justices concluded.
The court sent one part of the case back to lower courts to determine if claims against Dennis Hasty, the warden in charge of the Brooklyn detention facility where the detainees were held, could go forward.
The suit was filed by a group of Muslim, Arab and South Asian non-U.S. citizens who, their lawyers said, were held as terrorism suspects based on their race, religion, ethnicity and immigration status and abused in detention before being deported.
The lawsuit claimed that the senior Bush administration officials were liable because they made the policy decisions that led to the round-up and confinement of the plaintiffs.
The former officials were represented by the Justice Department. A spokesman declined to comment.
The plaintiffs were charged with only civil immigration violations. But they said they were subjected at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center to 23-hours-a-day solitary confinement, strip searches, sleep deprivation, beatings and other abuses and denied the ability to practice their religion.
They said their rights under the U.S. Constitution to due process and equal protection under the law were violated.
Liberal justices Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented from the ruling. Breyer took the relatively unusual step of reading his dissent from the bench, saying such lawsuits should be allowed to go forward in order "to provide appropriate compensation for those deprived of important constitutional rights and in times of special national-security need."
During the U.S. Justice Department's massive investigation after the Sept. 11 attacks, certain immigrants in the country illegally were detained until being cleared of involvement.
The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Ashcroft, Mueller and former Immigration and Naturalization Service Commissioner James Ziglar could be sued, based on a 1971 Supreme Court precedent. In 2013, a judge had dismissed the claims against them but allowed some against detention facility wardens.
Government lawyers have said there is no proof Ashcroft or Mueller personally condoned any potential unconstitutional actions.
The plaintiffs included Benamar Benatta, an Algerian Muslim who was seeking refugee status in Canada, and Ahmed Khalifa, an Egyptian Muslim who said he was on vacation.
In a similar previous case, the Supreme Court in 2009 backed Ashcroft, saying a lawsuit by detainees failed to contain specific details on his involvement. (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.