×

Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Watch out for our WikiLeaks, Afghan leader warns

by (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2010. Click For Restrictions. http://about.reuters.com/fulllegal.asp | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Tuesday, 7 December 2010 13:54 GMT

KABUL, Dec 7 (Reuters) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai attempted to turn the tables on his diplomatic tormentors on Tuesday, jokingly warning them to be careful his conversations about U.S. officials aren't made public by WikiLeaks.

U.S. diplomatic cables, obtained by the WikiLeaks website and published by several media outlets last week, said Karzai's own inner circle considered him weak and sometimes unscrupulous, while the U.S. embassy in Kabul described him as paranoid.

Karzai is known to have an often rocky relationship with U.S. officials, and is also seen as sensitive to criticism.

But during an unannounced visit to Afghanistan by British Prime Minister David Cameron, Karzai quipped that those who criticised him might have as much to fear from WikiLeaks.

The cables have been drip-fed to media outlets so far, with Afghanistan, Russia and China among the early victims.

"You should wait for the WikiLeaks for Britain so our conversation with Britain is leaked (about) America," Karzai said. Cameron quickly jumped in to add: "We were very nice about them, just to be clear."

Karzai shot back: "Most of the time."

Karzai's office has said Afghanistan's ties with Washington would not be hurt by the WikiLeaks scandal, although Britain in turn has since found the efforts of its troops criticised.

Cameron shrugged off the release of documents which suggested Karzai's government and U.S. officials thought British troops were "not up to the task" of securing Helmand province, a vital battleground and Taliban stronghold in the south.

He said the comments were out of date and referred to a time when insufficient British troops were spread too thinly across Helmand, a point now acknowledged by NATO and Afghan officials.

"If you look back to 2006, 2007, 2008, it's clear now that we didn't have enough troops in Helmand to deliver the security that was necessary," he said.

Karzai said he had only spoken about there being insufficient troops to cover the area in that period, not tactics or the ability of British troops.

Britain has about 9,500 troops in Afghanistan, most in Helmand, where they have been joined by 20,000 more U.S. troops as part of a 30,000-strong "surge".

At least 346 British troops have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001, almost a third of them this year.

(Editing by Paul Tait and Alex Richardson) (If you have a query or comment on this story, send an email to news.feedback.asia@thomsonreuters.com)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

-->