×

Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Maasai Elders Vow to Protect and Support the Rights of Women and Girls

by Deborah Espinosa | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Thursday, 21 June 2012 21:20 GMT

* Any views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author and not of Thomson Reuters Foundation.

A version of this blog post has been posted on One.org.

As part of the USAID-funded Justice Project, dozens of Maasai elders in the Kenyan highlands, who serve as symbols and enforcers of their community’s conservative cultural traditions, vowed last month to uphold an entirely new tradition: equal rights for women and girls.

These elders, who normally act as guardians of age-old cultural practices and mediators in this remote area far from the nearest courthouse, unanimously wrote and adopted a new constitution to guide their own behavior last month. The document promises unprecedented protections for widows, orphans, women and girls.

The elders’ document pledges to ensure that women are educated to prepare them for their new roles in the community and that men should “agree/accept that these women can actually have meaningful contributions [and] begin to value women’s contributions.”

Moreover, the constitution calls on the elders to start this pro-women’s movement in their own homes by “recognizing our wives first by listening to them because that is the only way they will become bold and free …If we recognize them, they will not fear to speak out in meetings.”

The elders also vowed, as part of the new constitution, to address “regressive cultural practices” including female genital mutilation, early marriage and poor educational expectations for girls.

The constitution, called a “katiba” in Massai, was an unexpected outcome of Landesa’s Justice Project. It can be read in full here.

The project aims to make the ideals embodied in Kenya’s new national constitution real for women in rural Kenya by piloting a model for improving women’s access to customary justice related to land.  The project aims to bridge the gap between the formal and informal justice sectors by improving chiefs and elders’, women’s, and the community’s knowledge about land and natural resource rights under the new Constitution as well as the constitutional recognition of the role of elders in promoting justice – and providing time and space for considering the implication of these historic constitutional changes.  In doing so, the pilot aims to shift attitudes regarding women's land rights and thereby improve community practice towards women's access and rights to land.  The approach assumes that, if conditions are right, creating safe spaces for targeted legal literacy training and facilitated dialogues among key stakeholder groups can result in positive changes to protect and enforce women's land rights.

 As part of the program, Landesa staff engaged the elders, women, and school children, in community conversations about the role of women.

The elders were initially hostile to ideas embodied in their nation’s new constitution (which was approved by Kenyan voters in 2010). But after a few weeks of earnest dialogue, they began to see the promise in allowing the women in their community equal rights. And eventually, the elders -– on their own accord -– determined that they should document their new thinking by drafting their own constitution on the issue. The document was debated in the community for weeks and adopted unanimously.

 “At the beginning I thought Kenya’s new constitution was about how women would be ahead of or on top of men,” said David Sange, the Masai chief in Ol Posimoru. “But now I understand that equality is what it is. And we can talk about it without conflict. The law isn’t about one person being on top of the other. It is about equality.”

And this isn’t mere platitudes. The elders understand that the words in their new document will change lives.

“As a chief, most of the issues I handle are family-based disagreements between a man and a woman,” continued Sange. “In the past it was difficult for me to rule in favor of the woman because of our culture and the difficulty in explaining to the man that women have a right. But now I am in better position to rule in favor of a woman. And I can articulate to the man in a way that he can understand and accept.”


-->