×

Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

 
Part of: Solar energy
Back to package

Clean energy gains ground - but old dirty habits die hard

by Laurie Goering | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:56 GMT

Installers from Baker Electric place solar panels on the roof of a residential home in Scripps Ranch, San Diego, California, U.S. Oct. 14, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Blake

Image Caption and Rights Information

"It's not just about phasing in the new technologies... You need a phase-out plan for the cheap incumbent fuels"

By Laurie Goering

LONDON, Nov 29 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Solar power is becoming so cheap so fast that in Abu Dhabi it's now less costly to produce a unit of energy from the sun than from oil, leading energy experts said this week.

But that doesn't mean a global switch to renewable energy will be inevitable or speedy, they told a London conference.

Difficult and sometimes unexpected problems still stand in the way, including pension funds heavily invested in fossil fuels, upfront costs for clean power, political flip-flops in key nations, and the lobbying prowess of old energy companies.

"Fossil fuels won't just go away by themselves," warned Patrick Graichen, executive director of Agora Energiewende, a German energy policy group.

In Germany, renewable sources account for about a third of electricity production but backing for coal persists, he told the discussion organised by think tank Chatham House.

"It's not just about phasing in the new technologies," he said. "You need a phase-out plan for the cheap incumbent fuels."

That could include tax breaks and credit to stop fossil fuel companies defaulting on debt if they fail or plants close early.

In Europe, the 16 largest power companies had net negative income for the first time last year, as old fossil fuel plants lost ground to renewables, said Tomas Kåberger, executive chair of Japan's Renewable Energy Institute and a professor of industrial energy policy in Sweden.

CORPORATE RESISTANCE

Such losses might be expected to drive a faster switch to renewable energy and quicken the demise of old plants, the experts said. But instead, traditional energy companies have lobbied hard for governments to remove support for renewables or even to tax them, and have blocked proposed fossil fuel levies.

"In Europe, the incumbent power companies are fighting for survival using the political influence they have," Kåberger said. "What we have seen in the last 18 months or so in most developed countries is a priority shift from supporting renewable (energy) to protecting incumbent power companies."

That's not the case in countries like China, which is rushing into solar and other renewables, driven by a desire to produce more power without worsening smog, and to make money by becoming a leader in a growing industry.

But Japan will struggle to make the same rapid shift, in part because both its banks and pension funds have major investments in traditional power companies, Kåberger said.

"For Japan it isn't a technical problem but a financial problem," he said. "The country doesn't want big power companies with big debts (owed) to pension funds to go down."

UPFRONT COSTS

Another problem hampering renewable energy expansion is the high initial cost of solar and other renewable energy sources. With fossil fuel plants, costs are more evenly spread between construction of facilities at the outset and buying fuel over time. With solar energy, 90 percent of the cost comes upfront, which can be hard for countries, companies and people to manage.

That makes the cost of borrowing crucial to whether clean power takes off in a country, Graichen said. Germany can produce solar power more cheaply than sunny Spain "because we have lower interest rates, not because we have more sun".

Countries that struggle to access finance are more likely to invest in fossil fuel capacity. Pakistan, for instance, desperately needs to generate more electricity to meet growing demand but is planning to get much of that from coal plants - still its cheapest option.

"Poor countries are going to electrify and they don't want to slow down. If they can do it cleanly, that's great, but if not they're still going ahead," said Laszlo Varro, chief economist for the International Energy Agency.

Telling them not to build coal plants "is not going to be a very fruitful conversation" unless alternatives are available, he said.

Still, there is plenty of good news on clean energy, the experts said. The sums invested in renewables have stagnated in recent years - but that is largely because solar power costs have fallen 90 percent since 2009, requiring much less money to buy the same amount of equipment.

Energy efficiency efforts also are ramping up around the world, Varro said. A move to more efficient appliances, for instance, means more people can buy fridges or air conditioning without driving a steep rise in planet-warming emissions.

Increased efficiency is one reason demand for new energy in many places is now small, even as GDP grows more quickly, Varro said, which is helping the transition to clean power.

One area where that shift is not working so well is in transportation, where cheap oil is encouraging people to buy bigger cars and drive more, he added.

Electric cars are growing in popularity but their success so far is "fragile", he emphasised.

(Reporting by Laurie Goering; editing by Megan Rowling; Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, climate change, women's rights, trafficking and property rights. Visit http://news.trust.org/climate)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

-->