Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Top EU court to give first ruling on Islamic headscarf bans

by Reuters
Monday, 13 March 2017 15:33 GMT

In this 2013 file photo a woman talks on a phone while looking at clothes in a shop window in Mantes-la-Jolie, a suburb of Paris, France. REUTERS/Youssef Boudlal

Image Caption and Rights Information

Islamic headscarf is a contentious issue in several European countries

By Waverly Colville

BRUSSELS, March 13 (Reuters) - The European Court of Justice (ECJ) will determine on Tuesday whether an employer can prohibit staff from wearing the Islamic headscarf in the first case of its kind before the EU's top court.

The ECJ will rule on the cases of two female employees in Belgium and in France, who were dismissed for refusing to remove their headscarves, a day before a Dutch parliamentary election dominated by the issue of immigration and integration.

The Islamic headscarf is a contentious issue in several European countries, notably France, which attaches importance to the separation of state and religious institutions and where the anti-immigration far-right National Front party is seen performing strongly in an election this spring.

The court's ruling will consider the case of a Belgian woman working as a receptionist for G4S Secure Solutions, which has a general ban on wearing visible religious or political symbols.

The court's advocate general last year recommended that companies should be allowed to prohibit headscarves as long as a general ban on other symbols was in place. Companies should though consider the conspicuousness of such symbols and the nature of the employee's activities.

The court's ruling will also cover a French IT consultant who was told to remove her headscarf after a client complained.

The advocate general's advice in the French case was that a rule banning employees from wearing religious symbols when in contact with customers was discrimination, particularly when it only applied to Islamic headscarves.

An opinion of an advocate general is not binding but is followed by the court in the majority of cases.

(Reporting by Waverly Colville; editing by Philip Blenkinsop and Richard Lough)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.