×

Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Inclusive or invasive? Digital ID stirs debate

by Carey L. Biron | @clbtea | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Friday, 14 September 2018 11:00 GMT

A Swiss Customs officer checks an identity card with UV light at the Swiss-Italian border station in Stabio, March 2, 2011. REUTERS/Fiorenzo Maffi

Image Caption and Rights Information

More than 1 billion people globally have no way of proving their identity

By Carey L. Biron

WASHINGTON, Sept 14 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Digital identity systems are a "revolutionary" way to provide the world's most vulnerable with access to essential services, but must protect their privacy, philanthropists, businesses and charities said on Friday.

More than 1 billion people globally have no way of proving their identity, according to the World Bank, which experts say excludes them from basic services such as education and healthcare.

But technologies like blockchain and mobile phones can support private digital identity systems that can be accessed anywhere, said Dakota Gruener of the ID2020 Alliance, a public-private consortium promoting the U.N. 2030 Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of providing legal identity for everyone.

Digital identity systems can be a "revolutionary" path to inclusion if done properly, said C.V. Madhukar, global lead on digital identity with the Omidyar Network, which funds the Thomson Reuters Foundation's property rights coverage.

"If you look at a 21st-century economy, so many activities including government services are transacted online," said Madhukar ahead of the third summit of ID2020 at the U.N. headquarters in New York.

"Therefore, the ability to establish one's identity uniquely and accurately every time is going to be critical."

However, such initiatives need to be carefully implemented to avoid violating privacy, security and user control over online data, according to Madhukar and Gruener.

"In order for (digital identity) to improve lives, it needs to be portable, including across borders; it needs to be able to be used throughout your life; personal, meaning tied to a unique human; and cyber-protected," Gruener said.

In India, which in 2009 launched the world's biggest biometric database to streamline welfare payments, experts have raised concerns about the susceptibility of biometrics to failure, and the misuse of data for profiling or surveillance.

Rising action to implement digital identity systems, spurred in particular by the SDGs, make it more critical than ever for the global community to agree on the parameters of a "good" digital identity, said Madhukar.

Initiatives from the ID2020 consortium include businesses Accenture Plc and Microsoft Corp teaming up to help individuals such as refugees prove who they are through a digital ID network using blockchain technology - a decentralised digital ledger shared by a network of computers.

Gruener said sectors like healthcare provided "kernels" that a digital identity could be built upon.

For example, 86 percent of children globally receive the DTap vaccine for diphtheria and other diseases, but only 65 percent of them have a birth certificate.

"In many countries, the most ubiquitous form of ID isn't a birth certificate, but a health card," Gruener said.

That card can be digitised to "form the kernel of a digital identity that they then carry for the rest of their lives", she said.

Other such "kernels" could include a digital birth certificate, a mobile phone SIM card or a microfinance loan, she added.

(Reporting by Carey L. Biron, editing by Jared Ferrie and Zoe Tabary; Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, women's rights, trafficking, property rights, resilience and climate change. Visit http://news.trust.org to see more stories.)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

-->