Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Flyers will pay more for carbon offsets but not tax, study finds

by Elena Berton | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Friday, 4 October 2019 16:38 GMT

ARCHIVE PHOTO: A jumbo jet takes off shortly before midday from Heathrow Airport in west London April 15, 2010.REUTERS/Toby Melville

Image Caption and Rights Information

People say they want a clear idea of where their money is going if they pay more for green travel

By Elena Berton

LONDON, Oct 4 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Travellers are willing to pay more for flights if they believe the extra money will be used to tackle carbon emissions, researchers said on Friday.

Passengers were more likely to book flights that carried an extra fee if it was labelled as carbon offset than if it was called a carbon tax, researchers at the University of British Columbia found.

Offsetting aims to mitigate the climate damage carbon emissions cause by paying to prevent or reduce emissions elsewhere.

"Taxes feel like you're charging people money for nothing," said David Hardisty, an assistant professor of marketing and behavioural science at UBC Sauder School of Business.

"Whereas an offset is the idea that, 'Sure we're paying, but we kind of have an idea where that payment is going, to make the environment better,' which is what people want."

The findings were published this week in the Journal of Environmental Psychology and suggest a possible way for the global airline industry, under pressure over carbon emissions, to improve its record.

The study consisted of two separate online surveys of more than 1,800 participants in the United States.

The aim was to gauge consumers' reaction to a $14 carbon fee that was presented to them in several different ways at the time of a hypothetical ticket purchase.

Consumers were more likely to pick a flight that included a carbon price when it was called "carbon offset for aviation fuel production and import" as opposed to "carbon tax for airplane travel".

They even chose more expensive tickets with a fee described this way over cheaper tickets that did not have the $14 fee attached, according to the study.

As global concern over the environment grows, many people are choosing to shun flying altogether rather than offset their emissions. A survey published this week found that one in five travellers reports flying less.

Meanwhile, celebrities who speak out about climate change, from actor Emma Thompson to Britain's Prince Harry, are facing growing scrutiny over their jetsetting.

Air travel already accounts for about 2.5 percent of global emissions and the rapid growth means that by 2050, aviation could take up a quarter of the world's "carbon budget", according to the United Nations.

(Reporting by Elena Berton, Editing by Claire Cozens. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, climate change, women's and LGBT+ rights, human trafficking, and property rights. Visit www.trust.org)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.