Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Planned Amazon roads could harm economies not just forests, researchers warn

by Anastasia Moloney | @anastasiabogota | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Monday, 16 March 2020 19:00 GMT

ARCHIVE PHOTO: Residents travel along a road cutting through Amazon jungle near near the city of Novo Progresso, Para state, July 1, 2013. REUTERS/Nacho Doce

Image Caption and Rights Information

Paving roads through the Amazon would result in a loss of $7.6 billion, researchers said

By Anastasia Moloney

BOGOTA, March 16 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - If governments follow through on plans to build thousands of kilometres of roads through the Amazon, the world's largest tropical rainforest, it will not only fuel deforestation but bring economic losses too, researchers said on Monday.

They examined the potential social, environmental and economic impact of 75 roads, totalling 12,000 km (7,456 miles), slated for construction in the remote Amazon basins of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru over the next five years.

Governments are set to spend $27 billion on constructing roads mainly to boost agriculture, including cattle-ranching and soybean production in Brazil, according to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal.

Yet 45% of the proposed road infrastructure projects would result in economic losses, the researchers estimated.

That means the initial investment and maintenance costs would be larger than the benefits - measured as reduced transportation costs - over a 20-year period, they said.

Cancelling those road projects would avoid a loss of $7.6 billion, the economists calculated.

Study co-author Alfonso Malky said many of the new road projects lacked "basic economic feasibility analyses" and did not have traffic estimations, the most important variable in determining their economic benefits.

Malky, who is Latin America technical director at the Conservation Strategy Fund, a global environmental group, said some of the 75 road projects examined also failed to properly address the social and environmental impacts of such development.


Scientists consider the Amazon forest as key to the fight against climate change because of the vast amounts of planet-warming carbon it stores.

With rising deforestation rates, particularly in Brazil - home to the biggest share of the Amazon - protecting the rainforest is an urgent priority, they say.

The study found that if all the planned roads were built, at least 2.4 million hectares of Amazon forest would be cleared in the next 20 years. Brazil would see the highest rates of deforestation, followed by Colombia.

In Brazil, for example, proposed projects to improve its 2,234-km trans-Amazonian highway (BR-230) would cause forest-cover loss amounting to nearly a quarter of the total predicted for the region by 2030, the study said.

"We have a lot of examples of roads that were built in the Amazon that are kind of environmental disasters and they affect negatively on the well-being of people," Malky told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Researchers also identified 18 road projects with the lowest social and environmental impacts.

If governments implemented only those projects while halting the rest, it would generate a net gain of $4 billion and result in less than 10% of the projected deforestation, they found.

Lead author Thais Vilela said all roads would have a negative effect on the environment, but states could choose to build only those with less harmful consequences.

"Governments, together with society and other stakeholders, should decide what is the level of negative environmental impact that's acceptable in exchange for economic benefits," she added. (Reporting by Anastasia Moloney; editing by Megan Rowling. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers the lives of people around the world who struggle to live freely or fairly. Visit http://news.trust.org)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.